In the two readings “Who are adolescents today?” and “The Complex
World of Adolescent Literacy: Myths, Motivations, and Mysteries” the authors
focus on adolescents. They talk about what it means to be an adolescent and
the impact it has on a learning environment. In the first reading the authors,
Intrator and Kunzman, focus on the importance the idea of “youth voice”, and
the conversation between teachers and adolescents. The second reading, on the
other hand, is based on a research study about the social and cultural
practices of adolescent literacy. I completely agree with Intrator and Kunzman,
in that, dialogue between students and teachers is almost nonexistent. Almost all
research done on adolescent literacy do not even mention anything on a student’s
perspective and how that can be beneficial for improving curriculum.
Moje defines an adolescent as person between the age of ten to
twenty. According to the reading adolescent literacy does not begin until
fourth grade. The study consisted of surveys, interviews, observations, and
analytic methods. A fact that I found quite surprising was, the results from
the study showed that 92% of students read outside of class. This is interesting
because people usually think that youth do not read, but that is not the case
here. Students were also asked how often they read for pleasure “students who
did indicate that they read for pleasure, the average frequency was 3.87, or
just under once per week (a 4 on our scale)” (Moje). The results then go on to show that female
students were more likely to read for pleasure, than the male students. African American students reported reading for
pleasure more frequently than Latino students and White” (Moje). The results
also showed that African American students were more likely to read for pleasure.
The reading did actually say that this
kind of reading does not really benefit the students, because when they do read
for pleasure it is not novels that improve literacy. One student in particular
even said he did not enjoy reading only if it is something he likes. Based on
my experience as a student, I never liked the books we read in class I always
thought they were boring. I think that could have been a reason why I am not
really a big fan of reading, even now. My question is, if we find the students novels
that interest them, and can improve literacy, could that encourage them to read
more novels outside of class? I included a picture of one of the harry potter
books because it was ine of my favorites growing up and I would have loved to
read it in class. The reading also talks about how social networks can affect literacy.
“Sixth grader Carlotta told an interviewer about being a member of a group that
wrote and shared personal goals: ‘We all have a copy of it, and then we save
it, and by the end of the year we see what goals we’ve accomplished’” (Moje).
The reading starts out by addressing how important it is for
students critiques on their experiences with the curriculum, even though they
are the ones that know the most about school. “Little attention is paid to
their experience; their critiques are rarely sought…as insiders, familiar with
every detail of school practice…and potentially, an agency for positive change”
(Intrator and Kunzman)”. There are little to no studies that focus on the
students point of view, that is how overlooked this topic is, even though it
can be very beneficial. It is important to hear the student’s point of view
because we are only trying to improve our methods to benefit them. “What is particularly
missing from the research is student perspective on teaching strategies” (Intrator
and Kunzman). I completely agree with this, looking at it from a student’s
perspective there was always somethings I did not like, when it came to
different teachers teaching styles. And, I know some of my peers felt the same way
about some of their teachers. I think maybe if we were able to voice our
opinions that could have possibly helped us in the long run. “Listening to students
plays and important role in education reform, it provides a necessary
foundation from which education leaders can develop informed opinions and take
practical action for school change” (Intrator and Kunzman). Students generally felt as though school is
boring or uninteresting. A solution to this can come from a discussion between
the teacher and the students. Perhaps, if the teacher is willing, they can
maybe change something about the way classroom is set up, to try to peak the student’s
interest. A question I have is, how can we as educators, get rid of the notion
that school is a boring place? How can we make students want to learn?
These readings definitely go hand in hand. “The Complex World of
Adolescent Literacy: Myths, Motivations, and Mysteries” focuses on the surveys,
observations, and analytical methods conducted on the students. The results
basically showed that, contrary to popular belief, students do actually read
outside of class. This is a good piece of information to know because according
to “Who are adolescents today?” dialogue between teachers and students can be
very beneficial. Teachers can talk to students and see what peeks their
interest, and they can maybe even find a way to incorporate that in the
classroom, so they are more engaged and willing to learn. Another idea that seemed
to get students more involved was “social networking” the more students did
things like read books and share poetry the more engaged they were. I believe
that creating more environment’s such as the one described by the sixth grader
(the book club), will get the students to not be bored and want to learn more.
I was also surprised that so many kids read for pleasure. And your idea of teachers asking what the kids were interested in and working it into the class is a great idea. Maybe the kids don't want to read Shakespeare, and are more into magic. Then, you can incorporate Harry Potter into English class. It would get the kids reading. The teacher then could discuss the books with the class, and keep them engaged in the books. The book club would also work, as it would put kids that like the same things together, and they could read and discuss it with each other, keeping themselves hooked.
ReplyDeletePatryk,
DeleteI appreciate the comment! I also found it quite surprising how much students actually read. I think a very common misconception is that kids do not enjoy reading, especially nowadays with so much technology around.
I wonder how you could get students to read more math and science texts? Literacy across curriculum is extremely important, but no high schooler wants to read a 4 page research analysis about math (neither do I). Maybe you could ask the class to find different news articles about current topics in STEM and have them present it to the class? Or analyze the actual math and science content in them? -Kiley
DeleteI agree with your analysis of the texts. I think the fact that so many students do indeed read for pleasure outside of the classroom, yet so many students describe school curriculum as boring, reflects the need for required books and texts in school to be more relevant and interesting to students -- there is a clear disconnect here. If teachers can somehow motivate students to read books that interest them but, at the same time, enhance their literary ability, students will be much more likely to actually read school-required texts, rather than considering them boring. I think this also relates to the Kunzman (2009) article citing the need for their to be dialogue between teachers and students. Only then can curriculum be improved in a way that benefits all parties, and enhances student learning.
ReplyDeleteAs I was reading Intrator and Kunzman, it wasn't until then that I really thought about the articles and studies I've read previously about adolescence and education and the severe lack of the voice of the students actually experiencing education first hand. Both Intrator and Kunzman, as well as you, bring up a good point in that now we need to, not that perhaps we should, incorporate and include the voices of these students. You worded it very well when you described your experiences with teachers and their teaching methods and how you thought maybe if you had an opportunity to voice your opinions, maybe you would've had a better experience. It is our education so why is it so rare that we get to actually voice and express our opinions on how we're being taught? This is definitely something we can all incorporate into our own classrooms.
ReplyDeleteI think the need to address the lack of representation students feel in the classroom is important. When students can not engage in a dialogue with their educator, they do not feel invested in the outcomes of their education and this leads to less positive results. I also agree that required reading in schools should be more relevant to students. Not only would it involve more students in investing in their education, but it would also make minority and underrepresented students feel more connected to their education if the books read appealed more closely to them rather than the traditional school-assigned readings.
ReplyDeleteDane,
DeleteThank you for the comment! I completely agree with you, the readings that are usually assigned are very boring and students can not really relate to them.
I completely agree with your overarching point on how student voice/perspective is usually overlooked by all these policymakers and educators. It baffles me because school is for the students. Why is it then, that we are not listening to them? They are the ones recieiving the education and they are products of the school they are in. They know school the best, so how can we better our teaching methods if we are simply ignoring their suggestions? Perhaps a bigger reason why students find school is boring is because the content does not connect with them one bit, or their teacher is doing something that does not work with the students. Constant discussion between the students and teacher should be taking place because the momentum adn rythm of the learning environment can change quickly since there is only so much time in a school day.
ReplyDeleteOverall, students should be treated with just as much respect as their teachers, staff, and faculty. Although they may like to think that they know what is best for the children and since they are the ones with an education, they know better, they are not the ones in the classroom. Times have changed ever since they have been in a classroom. Demographics have drastically changed and the demands/expectations society has for all students, especially those with minority backgrounds. They are expected to overcome every obstacle because with a proper education, the struggle will be worth it in the long run.
I really appreciated the fact that you highlighted how students are not being asked when researchers are attempting to understand how schools can work to improve literacy. This fact is astounding to me and probably indicative of why educators are having a difficult time. Furthermore, I remember that the only times I would ever read a book when I was growing up was when it was strongly recommended to me by a friend or family member. Thus, although I had not considered it before, I think that the idea of "social networking" witih regard to reading books and poetry could help to spread a love of reading throughout the entire community. Finally, I was a little confused by the statistic that 92% of students are reading outside of school. I was wondering if this was self-reported and what constitutes reading outside of school because virtually every American has to read every single day even if it is simply a menu or a street sign.
ReplyDeleteIt is really interesting to note that students read for pleasure outside of the classroom, yet what they read doesn't necessarily increase their literacy levels. And you're right in addressing the problem in the article, how can teachers get students to read for pleasure while at the same time increasing their literacy levels. Reading something that you're not interested in can be extremely boring. While I was reading the articles, I had the same thoughts about my own experiences reading in high school. There were some books I read that I enjoyed but there were a lot more that I didn't enjoy. It seemed to me that the books which I enjoyed were less of a challenge than the ones I didn't care for. So that challenge you brought up in your post really applies to my experiences.
ReplyDeleteI completely agree with this statement, in my highschool there was a huge barrier between teachers and students. If that barrier was eliminated, student would have a better chance at voicing their knowledge and grow more intellucatually. Students should be the main focus in learning and their perspective, thoughts, inputs are the most value resource.
ReplyDeleteI also agree with your statement mentioning that most students do like to read outside of the classroom. I think they just struggle with finding a book that interest them or that most students are exhausted from school work, sports and work that when they finally have down time its hard to choose a book as a relaxing method.
I think the results from Moje’s study surprises most of us who think that adolescents do not read. This finding leads me to think about the reason behind the phenomenon. In Intrator and Kunzman’s article, it is emphasized that adolescents think the curriculum disconnected with their experienced and seems useless to their life. I think it may explain why youth read outside school. Perhaps they want to seek answers to some unknown areas they are curious about, which they cannot learn from school. And you mentioned the results from the study also showed that African American students were more likely to read for pleasure. When I read this, I thought of Nieto’s (1994) study mentioned in Intrator and Kunzman’s article. Nieto finds that “curricula linked to students’ background and experiences are missing in many schools”. In addition, Phelan, Yu, and Davidson’s (1994) study shows that ethnically diverse youth perceive themselves as outsiders in the classroom and they have to “deny fundamental aspects of their personal and ethnic identities in order to ‘fit in’.” The studies suggest that many adolescents especially ethnically diverse cannot feel cared and learn what they desire in the classroom. They do not have much chance giving their voices to express what they are interested in. However, they have autonomy to choose what they truly want to read outside school, which leads them read for pleasure. I think educators should try to explore how to keep adolescents’ pleasure of learning, from outside school to the classroom.
ReplyDeleteNumerous survey and analysis results are listed in this article, which is about literacy practice of adolescent. I agree with your idea that in many education studies, researchers did not mention anything from a student's perspective. In fact, many students prefer out-of-school practices rather than in-school readings. However, educators always only notice the negative results without realizing that the reason for this is that we don't know what students are really interested in. Some out-of-school readings such as novels are often relevant to our daily lives, which can not only promote student's perception and understanding of the world but also increase their reading ability. Then, they will have more ideas to share with their teachers, so that it will help in promoting the communication between teachers and students and exploring their motivations. Some findings suggest that young people will read, but they may need suggestions for reading and writing activities. (25) Overall, as educators, we should make more efforts on finding the potential match between the content of the texts that students are reading outside of school and the content of their studies and engineering a new type of classroom texts.
ReplyDeleteAlvermann's use of Freire's idea of education/literacy as empowering or domesticating is very interesting, specifically with regards to how it implies self-awareness among students and the knowledge that teachers are short changing them when they don't challenge them while providing the necessary supports that they may need to reach specific literacy goals. Alvermann speaks to the self-efficacy of the student voicing her sentiments on the topic, but I think it also speaks to student perception of classroom instruction. Teachers may think that they give as much work as students are willing to do, not realizing that students may be digesting these non-verbal messages as lack of caring or interest on the part of the teachers.
ReplyDeleteIts interesting that in the reading "Who Are Adolescents Today" you mention the reports of the different groups that like to read and yet certain groups that were mentioned don't get support to have the resources or books to read for pleasure. It seems self-explanatory to assume that if students are able to read what they like their skills in reading can improve as well but its worth noting that the levels of reading students are looking at are within the reading level they need to be or work on. Which the author makes a good effort regarding in the reading.
ReplyDeleteThanks for emphasizing how important dialogue is between teachers and students. I was wondering as I read the Moje article how the students felt after being interview as part of the study. It seems to me that those are the types of conversations that are most beneficial within the classroom to encourage autonomy and accountability in literacy. Also, they reminded me a little of conferences I have observed in LA classrooms with students on reading and writing, although those usually focused on reading more traditional texts like novels. From what I've seen, having these conversations leads to more reading outside of the classroom and more application of the techniques they've been learning in that reading. It makes me curious if that could be extended to the less traditional texts they read as well.
ReplyDelete